Strengthen the programme young people already trust.
Add structured decision practice and honest evidence to an existing youth programme, without replacing facilitators or the local safeguarding model.
Programme Fit
Start from the programme, not the platform.
We map the fit before we scope a programme.
Use it where the programme already has trust.
Pick the shape that matches the work already in motion, then check whether the fit is honest.
Reinforce an existing programme
Add selected sessions to a youth programme, mentoring pathway, or financial-literacy strand.
Create a focused pathway
Shape a short pathway around money decisions, work readiness, enterprise, or digital judgment.
Host or access a funded cohort
Explore funded places, joint funding, or a sponsor-supported access model.
Likely a good fit when
- You already run a trusted programme for young people aged roughly 11-16
- Your facilitators stay central to the session experience
- You need honest programme evidence for learning, trustees, funders, or partners
Probably not the right fit when
- You need Informative to replace your youth workers or safeguarding model
- You need guaranteed outcome claims rather than honest, reviewable evidence
- Your priority is learner ranking, accreditation, or certification
For a broader view of learning areas and activities, explore the curriculum.
The relationship stays at the centre.
Your team leads the moment. Informative carries the lesson path, live prompts, practice, and evidence underneath.
Local framing
Facilitator opens the context
Group discussion
Young people explore together
Decision practice
Young people practise the decision
Human-led debrief
Facilitator reconnects the experience
Useful review
Programme team reviews the evidence
What Informative carries at each stage
Local framing
Mapped lesson path
Selected lessons, session order, and cohort assignment
Group discussion
Live prompts and votes
Polls, votes, and shared prompts for the room
Decision practice
Applied practice
Activities, simulations, and challenges tied to the session
Human-led debrief
Decision trail
Facilitator notes plus what each learner decided and why
Useful review
Cohort evidence
Cohort visibility, per-learner reports, CSV/JSON export
Designed around real delivery constraints.
Access, duty of care, and reporting are scoped before delivery.
Small teams and limited headspace
A first cohort should be light enough to deliver and review.
Different communities need different framing
Examples and notes adapt to the cohort and local context.
Access and accessibility cannot be assumed
Device access, setting, language, and accessibility needs are scoped first.
Safeguarding remains local and connected
Your organisation remains the local safeguarding lead.
Reporting has more than one audience
Trustees, funders, staff, and partners may need different summaries.
Clear roles before the first session.
Three lanes keep the first cohort accountable.
Your organisation leads
- Relationships and referrals
- Safeguarding and escalation
- Cohort invitation and setting
Informative provides
- Activities and session materials
- Learn, Practice, Reflect visibility
- Reports, exports, and decision signals
We agree together
- Learner group, setting, access, accessibility
- Useful reporting without overclaiming
- Repeat, adapt, expand, or stop
School procurement belongs on the schools route; commercial delivery models belong on the partners route.
Evidence your team can use.
Review the programme without turning young people into rankings.
What happened
Attendance and engagement signals.
What young people produced
Decision records, reflections, notes, and outputs.
What may have changed
Pre/post measurement aggregated across the cohort.
What the programme learned
Patterns and next-step choices, without rankings.
Every rung is evidence you can see and check - not outcome claims you are asked to take on trust.
Start with one defined programme.
Scope one programme clearly enough to learn from it.
Share what already exists
Programme, cohort, setting, outcomes, access, and reporting.
Map the moments
Where Informative helps, and where it stays out of the way.
Agree readiness and responsibilities
Safeguarding, access, roles, data, reporting, and funding.
Deliver one defined programme
Bounded cohort, selected activities, agreed evidence posture.
Review before doing more
Repeat, adapt, expand or stop.
Charity FAQs.
Is this for charities that already run youth programmes?
Yes. It is for human-led programmes, facilitator relationships, and youth-services pathways already in place.
Can we use only selected activities?
Yes. The mapping conversation identifies which activities fit your cohort and which do not.
Who remains responsible for safeguarding?
Your organisation remains the local safeguarding lead. Informative does not replace your policy or escalation routes.
What evidence does a charity get?
Cohort visibility, learner reports, facilitator notes, decision-moment evidence, data exports, and pre/post measurement across the cohort.
What won't you do?
We don't rank young people, issue certificates, or make guaranteed-outcome claims. The evidence is about making real decisions and progress visible - not manufacturing scores.
Can funded places be explored?
Yes. Use the charity enquiry for programme mapping, or the sponsor route for funded access.
Will funders or sponsors see individual learner data?
No. Sponsor-facing reporting is aggregated; individual learner data is not shared with sponsors.
Can this fit a school-linked or community setting?
Yes, if responsibilities are clear. School procurement stays on the schools route.
What will you ask from us?
Organisation, region, cohort, learner count, funding status, programme context, access, accessibility, and reporting.
Start with the programme you already run.
Share the cohort, setting, outcomes, access needs, safeguarding responsibilities, funding status, and reporting needs. We will map the useful moments.
Need the full privacy, safeguarding, and evidence posture? Review trust and evidence.